A young associate in the firm recently came to me with a question about a new client that had been served 30 days’ notice to be relocated. He showed me the lease the previous broker had negotiated, and the “landlord relocation-right” clause was very vague; it was merely two sentences and the only thing that was certain is that with 30 days’ notice, the tenant could be moved at any time by the landlord to comparable space, and the landlord would pay for a short list of undefined relocation costs.
Tragically this happens more than I would care to think about. This experience, coupled with another recent positive experience with a client of mine dodging a relocation, mentioned in my previous blog got me thinking that I should write a blog to advise and warn those small, medium, and sometimes even large companies that find themselves unfortunately in a lease negotiation with a landlord insisting on the relocation right clause – exposing them to potentially massive business disruption that is expensive and inconvenient.
Every tenant is in a different situation, so there are no hard and fast rules. However, your representation team (both your broker and your real estate lawyer) needs to be strategic in language negotiated to clearly define the landlord right, various mechanics of exercising the right, and the limitations of the right to protect your business. Let’s discuss some concepts to consider in negotiating language for this clause:
The lease should always say that the landlord will pay the costs associated with a relocation of a tenant induced by the landlord. This includes:
Tenants can incur all kinds of costs in a landlord-induced relocation, far beyond those listed here. Yes, the landlord should always be responsible for the costs but the onus is always on the tenant to not only prove those costs, but also to make sure that the lease clause pertaining to relocation-related expenses is as broad as possible and includes language detailing how the landlord will make the tenant whole including timing and method of payment (e.g. paying various vendors directly, reimbursement, rent credit).
Avoiding the interruption and disruption of business is of primary importance to the tenant. Every tenant has a different business situation, so the approach isn’t universal, but it is important to make sure the relocation provision language allows the tenant to prepare for the relocation properly so as not to interrupt its business. Here is some language tenants should consider negotiating into the relocation right clause of their leases:
“Comparable space” is a very vague concept if not clearly outlined in the lease by several different factors. Consider including the following factors in the clause language:
In the event of a forced relocation, sometimes the landlord is unable to provide its tenants comparable space in a reasonable timeframe. Having explicit language that gives the tenant a termination right is crucial in this situation. If a relocation scenario arises, this language may even dissuade the landlord from ever attempting to exercise the right if they value enough of the “bird in hand” (i.e. the tenant’s existing revenue stream, tenancy, and relationship). Landlords don’t like to grant termination options in lease negotiations, but it is a reasonable ask, especially if there are critical factors that must be met in order for the relocation to be acceptable.
Spelling out how this right affects the lease after it is invoked should be worked out in the original lease language – i.e. will there be an amendment? New lease? Addendum? Is it silent on how adjustments are made? If so, this is bad news for the tenant, especially if they don’t have any leverage. What is the timing of relocation expense reimbursement? When do other adjustments affecting the tenant’s budget get adjusted? Drafting a great clause on the mechanics of how things will work is as key to the tenant as the negotiated terms or relocation right itself.
Protect yourself! Properly documenting this landlord right and how it will be executed if invoked is critical. If the rules of the game are not spelled out, the landlord will likely dictate what happens and the tenant is guaranteed to lose. Tenants beware!
Love and Light!
– Also Featured On Exis –